Search for: "Bar's Products Inc v. Bars Products International Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 453
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2022, 3:24 am
Harwood International Incorporated, Cancellation No. 92070634 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark HAPPIEST HOUR for "bar and restaurant services," on the ground of priority and likelihood of confusion with Petitioner's common law mark THE HAPPIEST HOUR for identical services.] [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:52 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The court held that a provision of the Communications Decency Act known as §230 bars Doe's common-law claims, but not her statutory sex-trafficking claim. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:38 am by Neil Wilkof
Added to this was the aftermath from the Supreme Court's decision in Alice Corp v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 3:08 am
Here, since military personnel are housed in tents, and third-party retailers tout the quality of these products used by NATO forces, the applicant's tents are the type of goods that consumer would associate with the military. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Retired and active Bayport-Bluepoint employees who participated in the retirement savings plan and opted to have their salary reductions deposited in Horizon's Choices Unlimited product lost their money when Horizon was liquidated. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Retired and active Bayport-Bluepoint employees who participated in the retirement savings plan and opted to have their salary reductions deposited in Horizon's Choices Unlimited product lost their money when Horizon was liquidated. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court‘s recent opinion in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
International Code Council, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  It's therefore important to describe the facts in some detail in order to understand what’s at issue, and what's at stake.When a child in Pennsylvania is subjected to neglect, abuse or exploitation in his or her home that can’t otherwise be remedied, the government of the county in which the child lives—or, in Philadelphia, the City government—has a statutory duty to take custody of the child. [read post]