Search for: "Bar-1 Ranch 2, LLC"
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm
Discussion Jody James and the Agency disagree about (1) whether the Agency is liable for Jody James's loss; (2) whether they agreed to arbitrate the merits of that issue; and (3) whether the trial court or the arbitrator should decide whether they agreed to arbitrate the merits. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Exemptions Protect Tustin Ranch v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
1. 2017 CEQA UPDATE To read the 2017 cumulative CEQA review, click here: 2. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
(See 1/12/17 post.) [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm
City of San Diego (2017) 19 Cal.App.5th 161, 187 [my 1/16/18 post on which can be found here]; and Stop Syar Expansion v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
” Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
” Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
The List 1. [read post]
