Search for: "Barclay v. Administrator"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 1:17 pm
Barclays Bank, PLC, Civ. [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:46 am
Barclays Bank, PLC, Civ. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
She discussed the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:44 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:05 am
In doing so, the author also analyses to what extent the decision is in line with the more recent judgment of the ECJ in Kolassa v Barclays Bank. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The Administrative Court had not thought it appropriate to distinguish Bancoult (No 2) when this had not been considered in Barclay (No 1). [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:19 pm
& C.R. 221 ; Barclays Bank Plc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:47 am
Preparing for his role in Melton v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am
” After RBS, the second and third largest FSA fines, which were assessed against UBS AG and Barclays Bank plc (at £160 million, and £59.5 million, respectively) in 2012, also related to the LIBOR scandal. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:26 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Doyle & Ors v R [2012] EWCA Crim 995 (16 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rehill v Rider Holdings Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 628 (16 May 2012) Sulamerica CIA Nacional De Seguros SA & Ors v Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 638 (16 May 2012) Sucafina SA v Rotenberg [2012] EWCA Civ 637 (16 May 2012) JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2012] EWCA Civ 639 (16 May 2012) Durden v Aston [2012] EWCA Civ… [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm
Rogers, Chief Administrative Trademark Judge of the TTAB, Hon. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:41 am
McKillen and the Barclays own stakes in a high profile hotel group; and in these proceedings, McKillen alleges that the Barclays have been attempting to seize control of the group by unlawful means. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions Department for Education v Molyneux [2012] EWCA Civ 193 (28 February 2012) Independent Trustee Services Ltd v GP Noble Trustees Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 195 (28 February 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tuncel & Anor [2012] EWHC 402 (Admin) (28 February 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Decisions Barclay Pharmaceuticals Ltd & Ors… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:42 am
The Court’s reasoning It was clear from the authorities (Abnett v British Airways Plc [1997] A.C. 430 and Barclay v British Airways Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 1419) that the Montreal Convention had exclusivity in domestic law. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:03 am
Dee V Benson, US Dist. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:27 am
A. at V(B)(1). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:47 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Revenue and Customs v Jones & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 824 (18 July 2011) Barclays Bank Plc v Nylon Capital LLP [2011] EWCA Civ 826 (18 July 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Milsom & Ors v Ablyazov [2011] EWHC 1846 (Ch) (18 July 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Secretary of State for the Home Department v BF [2011] EWHC 1878 (Admin) (18 July 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
