Search for: "Barclay v. Barclay" Results 21 - 40 of 514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2008, 1:23 am
Hanchett-Stamford v Attorney General and another (Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd intervening) [2008] EWHC 330 (Ch); WLR (D) 73 “The assets of an unincorporated association, which was not a charity and which had ceased to exist due to the fall in its membership to below two, did not pass to the Crown as bona vacantia but vested in the sole surviving member of the association. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
In reality, and undisclosed to clients, Barclays failed to provide those services, because it (i) failed to remove known predatory traders from its dark pool; (ii) failed to regularly profile traders in its dark pool; (iii) granted liberal “overrides” to high frequency trading firms and to Barclays’ own internal trading desks (which themselves employ “aggressive” trading strategies), in order to make them appear less “toxic” than they… [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 3:11 am
  Now Barclays has filed this action in federal court based on losses it suffered from the other failed hedge fund.The action, entitled Barclays, PLC v. [read post]
Pease On July 16, 2013, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued an order finding Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”), Daniel Brin, Scott Connelly, Karen Levine, and Ryan Smith (together with Barclays, “Defendants”) in violation of FERC’s anti-manipulation regulations and assessed significant penalties.[1]  The Defendants chose to have the validity of the order tried de novo in [...] [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:38 am by sally
Barclays Bank plc v Nylon Capital LLP [2011] EWCA Civ 826 ; [2011] WLR (D) 235 “In any case where a dispute arose as to the jurisdiction of an expert, a court was the final decision maker as to whether the expert had jurisdiction, even if a clause purported to confer that jurisdiction on the expert in a manner that was final and binding. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 4:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
It alleges that during the class period the defendants misled these investors by making false or misleading statement or failing to disclose that   (i) Barclays engaged in a “systematic pattern of fraud and deceit” by using its dark pool to favor high-frequency traders over its other clients; (ii) the pools were promoted as offering investors protection from predatory traders, while Barclays instead courted HFT firms by charging them lower rates; (iii)… [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
I am sure that the possible effect of the Morrison v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 3:25 am
Barclays Agrees to Pay $2 Billion in Civil Penalties to Resolve Claims for Fraud in the Sale of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities /Two Former Barclays Executives Agree to Pay $2 Million to Resolve Claims Brought Against Them Individually (DOJ Press Release)https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/barclays-agrees-pay-2-billion-civil-penalties-resolve-claims-fraud-sale-residential-mortgageIn the United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:26 am by CMS
Alaina Wadsworth, Chris Horsefield and Ben Brown, who all work within the Insurance & Reinsurance Group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court earlier this month, in the matter of Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13: Earlier this month, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in the matter of Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 10:11 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Tiger Lily Ventures Ltd v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:06 am
An amusing discovery order from yesterday; thanks to Michael Barclay for the pointer.... [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:29 pm by Doug Isenberg
On its face, a ruling by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Barclays v. [read post]