Search for: "Bari v Bari" Results 21 - 40 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2010, 6:24 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Moreover, a building permit issued due to a misrepresentation by the applicant or an error by the municipal agency cannot confer rights in contravention of the zoning laws, and is subject to corrective action, even where the results may be harsh (see Matter of Parkview Assoc. v City of New York, 71 NY2d at 282; Town of Putnam Val. v Sacramone, 16 AD3d 669, 670; McGannon v Board of Trustees for Vil. of Pomona, 239 AD2d 392, 393; Baris Shoe Co. v Town of… [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am by Söğüt Atilla
The Retromark update also listed the infamous Lidl v Tesco case, in which the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) reversed the copyright infringement finding but reluctantly upheld the trade mark infringement ruling; the Lifestyle Equities v Amazon case, where the UK Supreme Court confirmed that Amazon US was targeting UK consumers; and the commonly misunderstood Supermacs v EUIPO case where, the General Court of the EU merely stated that McDonalds’ use of its mark… [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:45 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sarkar v West London Mental Health NHS Trust [2010] EWCA Civ 289 (19 March 2010) Maroudas v Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 280 (18 March 2010) Connor v Surrey County Council [2010] EWCA Civ 286 (18 March 2010) William Hare Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 283 (18 March 2010) Bloomsbury International Ltd & Ors. v The Sea Fish Industry Authority & Anor… [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:49 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
She focuses on the misunderstanding of the CJEU's YouTube, C-682/18 and C-683/18 judgment in the decisions of the Rome Court of First Instance in RTI v Vimeo and RTI v V Kontakte; for example, the Rome Court misunderstood that YouTube concerned primary, not secondary, liability of of a platform operator, and unduly reduced the guidance in YouTube to a formal (and empty) checklist. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 12:02 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
The Court confirmed that moral rights have a high level of protection, but these rights are not absolute, although the total removal in this case was disproportionate.Antonios Baris discussed the decision in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 11:16 pm by Asude Sena Moya
The Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v Fontana Food AB case concerned two trade mark applications for the words "GRILLOUMI" and "GRILLOUMAKI". [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 6:13 am by Asude
Our Katfriend considered several aspects regarding copyright ownership.Antonios Baris released the greatest hit of summer 2024: The EleonORe Song. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:52 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
The Board of Appeal held that the claimed invention was novel and involved an inventive step.Trade MarksAlessandro Cerri reported on the highly anticipated judgment of the England & Wales Court of Appeal in Lidl v Tesco, which upheld the High Court's findings on bad faith, infringement, and passing off, including the findings in respect of the 'price-matching' allegation. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:38 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Under Federal Rule of Evidence 201(c), "A court may take judicial notice, whether requested or not. [read post]