Search for: "Barnes v. Walker" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:02 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Judges Friedlander, Darden and Barnes. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Jay Willis
Douglas Berman of the Sentencing Law Blog and Sarah Miley of Jurist note yesterday’s cert. grant in Walker v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
” Perhaps unsurprisingly, Barnes was found guilty of, among other things, two counts of first-degree murder. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:13 pm
Barnes ("The defendant... appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him in violation of probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
In Wednesday’s other opinion, Walker v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Begging the question, does the next age in software protection belong to copyright (see Apple v Psystar, Oracle v Google)? [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Rulings               IPSO has published a single resolution statement this week and three rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 20525-17 Sutcliffe v dailypost.co.uk 20614-17 Walker v mirror.co.uk: No breach of Principle 1 – Accuracy 20385-17 Hill v express.co.uk: Breach of Principle 1 – Accuracy 19719-17 Thomson v Sunday Post: Breach of Principle 1… [read post]