Search for: "Barrett v. U.s.*"
Results 21 - 40
of 278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Rapanos v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
Dávila v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Biden v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman]. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 10:54 am
Nonetheless, Acheson Hotels v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
There is an ongoing debate over whether the MQD is a substantive canon that serves separation of powers or simply a tool of ordinary statutory interpretation, as Justice Barrett argued in her concurrence in Biden v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
Barrett Financial Group, LLC, 2023 WL 7552330 (D. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Because the government now agrees with petitioner Paul Erlinger that judges cannot constitutionally make that finding, the court appointed Nick Harper, former clerk to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, to argue in support of the judgment below. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
" That referred to then-Judge Barrett's dissent in Kanter v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 8:21 am
Barrett, No. 22-cr-00071 (M.D. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
" Bruen continues, "In other words, this 19th-century evidence was 'treated as mere confirmation of what the Court thought had already been established.'" See also Justice Barrett's concurrence in Bruen, quoting Espinoza v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In all likelihood, additional conservatives on today's Court also would have broken from Scalia in that case.I also tend to think that Justice Scalia would not have joined Justice Barrett's four-Justice Nance v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 10:59 pm
In so doing, Judge Kethledge relied heavily on an en-banc dissent written by then-Judge Barrett in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
