Search for: "Barrett v. University of Colorado"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2022, 9:57 am
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:03 pm
Wade and Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Colorado GOP Rejects Candidates Who Back Trump Election Lie MSN – Nicholas Riccardi (Associated Press) | Published: 6/29/2022 Colorado Republicans rejected two of the state’s most prominent election deniers, a setback for the movement to install those who echo former President Trump’s lies about mass voter fraud in positions overseeing voting. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
University of North Carolina, 21-707. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
Author: Bill Pizzi, emeritus University of Colorado Law SchoolAbortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
To Justice Barrett’s question about a social service agency raising a religious objection to interracial marriage, Windham answered by citing to Loving v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
So would the same apply to a 10 university or a college if it opposed same-sex marriage? [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:29 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:26 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, Barrett indicated that as a law professor at Notre Dame she was a member of University Faculty for Life, an organization whose website indicates that it “seeks to promote the prolife cause at Notre Dame. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
” In another article, “Stare Decisis and Due Process,” published in the University of Colorado Law Review, Barrett discussed the legal doctrine that generally requires courts to follow existing precedent, even if they might believe that it is wrong. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm
[Marbury v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
” In another article, Stare Decisis and Due Process, published in the University of Colorado Law Review, Barrett discussed the concept of stare decisis – a legal doctrine that generally requires courts to follow existing precedent, even if they might believe that it is wrong. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
Barrett. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm
Presser, the Raoul Berger Professor of Legal History, emeritus, at the Northwestern University School of Law, has been named a 2018-19 Visiting Scholar in Conservative Thought and Policy at the University of Colorado Boulder. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:48 pm
Among other things, Duncan was counsel of record in Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
City of Albuquerque, overturning a grant of summary judgment against a pregnancy discrimination plaintiff; and Barrett v. [read post]
