Search for: "Bates v. Settles" Results 21 - 40 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2019, 8:29 am by Matthew Schoonover
Small businesses, for the most part, have been watching with bated breath for the SBA to comply with the Runway Extension Act. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm by Giles Peaker
  The claimants (and Liberty) argued that this should be considered as a ‘modality’ case, as per Bah v United Kingdom (2012) 54 EHRR 21. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm by Eliot Kim
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:34 am by Robert Chesney
The case went before Judge John Bates, who granted the government’s motion to dismiss it. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
Court-watchers continue to parse Wednesday’s oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:12 am
The author contrasts Judge Bates’ view that the provisions of the DMCA provide enough protection for privacy rights (in Re Verizon DDC 2003) with Judge Garcia’s position that the harm caused by disclosure would be too great a violation of the users’ privacy rights (in Capitol Records, Inc v Does 1-16). [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
That question will focus on the consequences of an emerging “tension” for settled notions of connection between law systems and the state. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
  Andrew considered that Regeneron v Kymab [2016] EWHC 87 (Pat) represented the most technically difficult decision of the year, although he noted that Electromagnetic Geoservices v PGS would have run it pretty close had the case not settled. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day the oral renewal of the application for permission to appeal in the case of Weston v Bates was refused by Sharp LJ. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
On the same day there was an application in the case of Holyoake & Anor v Candy & Ors before Warby J. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
”   Seasoned attorneys—or those who were practicing law before the United States Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Bates v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
The cases could give rise to a “settled understanding” which was relevant to issues of statutory interpretation. [read post]