Search for: "Beebe v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Related to Barton Beebe’s observations about the sumptuary code, but it’s not directly about class but about control over the message (though it may cash out as class).Laura Heymann: SignificantObjects.com—origin stories written by well known authors for store bought items; sold for $8000 when bought for $1.25 because of the stories associated with those specific iterations. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
My poster child: Gordon v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:22 am
This follows the Matal v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:04 am
Professors Barton Beebe and Jeanne C. [read post]
17 May 2019, 2:49 pm
,Exxon Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:29 am
This paper served as the basis for Professors Beebe and Fromer's amicus brief in Iancu v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
INS v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:01 am
Professors Barton Beebe and Jeanne C. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 5:32 am
Equinox Hotel Management, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:09 am
” At another point, however, citing United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Coach v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Icon * Beebe on Trademark Dilution * Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Fox News v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
In last year, Sofa Works v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Barton Beebe has discussed what TM owners do to keep consumers in their place, but it’s very hard to keep them there. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:25 am
The interstate compact creating the metropolitan transit authority contained provisions regarding immunity, and in Beebe v. [read post]
