Search for: "Bell v. So. Central Bell Telephone" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2012, 4:27 am by Susan Brenner
So, no bias incorporated, none intended.) [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
Jefferson County, Alabama (1996) and South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:34 am by Christopher Markus
  The Ohio Eighth District Court of Appeals’ decision in Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
The Bell System's monopoly on what could be connected to telephones had been broken, so the heavy hand of its contracts was as absent as the FCC. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
  Richard Langley (Bircham Dyson Bell LLP). [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 5:25 am
South Central Bell Telephone Co., 329 So.2d 744 (La. 1975), applied- “the right to damages conferred by a lease was a personal right, not a property right, and as a personal right/obligation, it did not pass to the new owners of the land because there was no specific conveyance of it in the instrument of sale. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:43 pm
The Supreme Court has issued an opinion in BELL ATLANTIC CORP. et al. v. [read post]