Search for: "Bell v. Watson"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 9:56 am
Bagley, Judge, Superior Court, Bell-Forsyth Judicial Circuit, Cumming, Hon. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 11:33 pm
Watson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Elections Posted by Michael Sozan, Center for American Progress, on Friday, December 6, 2019 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:04 am
Norwitz, Sabastian V. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:03 pm
Cir. 1995); In re Bell, 991 F.2d 781 (Fed. [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:48 am
In State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
“On Friday 13 February the Judicial Office was made aware of the existence of a summons containing certain allegations against a number of individuals including part-time sheriff Peter Watson.The Lord President’s Private Office immediately contacted Mr Watson and he offered not to sit as a part-time sheriff on a voluntary basis, pending the outcome of those proceedings.Mr Watson e-mailed a copy of the summons to the Lord President’s Private Office on Saturday 14… [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:39 am
Bell, Brian M. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
Just in time for Murdoch’s visit, Tom Watson MP has released his new book, co-written with journalist Martin Hickman, Dial M for Murdoch. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
The CJEU’s recent decision in the Tele2/Watson case may call the viability of the new Investigatory Powers Act into question. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
Watson Chapel Sch. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:27 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Sunday, March 17, 2019 Tags: Accountable Capitalism Act, Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm
On Tuesday 30 January 2018, in the case of Watson v Home Secretary ([2018] EWCA Civ 70) confirmed that section 1 of the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 was inconsistent with EU in certain important respects. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:13 am
For instance, in Texas v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm
Michael Geist continues to consider Bell Media’s controversial Fair Play initiative. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Bell, 2010 U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
The decision is here: Barnes v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star (Sheffield)… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
