Search for: "Ben Schiff"
Results 21 - 40
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
Mieke Eoyang, Ben Freeman, Ryan Pougiales and Benjamin Wittes discussed the findings from their November 2018 public confidence in national security institutions survey. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:41 pm
Ben moderated a panel on national security and law enforcement with Lawfare contributor and long-time Department of Justice official Mary McCord; former head of the DEA Chuck Rosenberg; and Representative Adam Schiff, ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Adam Schiff (D. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:27 pm
If Schiff & Co. are to be believed, the explanation for this obscurity was nothing more than routine minimization of U.S. person identities—and the FBI did a reasonable job conveying in general terms who Steele was and for whom he was working. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:37 am
Ben Sasse (R-NE), May 15: Big picture, there’s a lot we don’t know, but I think three things are relevant immediately. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:37 am
Ben Sasse (R-NE), May 15: Big picture, there’s a lot we don’t know, but I think three things are relevant immediately. [read post]
13 May 2017, 8:51 am
Ben and Steve Vladeck presciently examined the state of presidential immunity under Trump. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm
Bobby Chesney offered a section-by-section analysis of Representative Adam Schiff’s consolidated AUMF proposal. [read post]
9 May 2017, 5:58 pm
Adam Schiff (D-CA) — House Committee on Intelligence Ranking Member: The decision by a president whose campaign associates are under investigation by the FBI for collusion with Russia to fire the man overseeing the investigation, upon the recommendation of an Attorney General who has recused himself from the investigation, raises profound questions about whether the White House is brazenly interfering in a criminal matter. [read post]
8 May 2017, 3:10 pm
— Ben Judah (@b_judah) May 5, 2017 "We can expect a frank meeting with Putin. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 11:18 am
Ben also appraised the efforts of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s investigation into Russia’s role in the 2016 election and cautions that it is too early to label it a flop. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
I am happy to announce the publication of an article, "The Emerging Normative Structures of Transnational Law: Non-State Enterprises in Polycentric Asymmetric Global Orders," that appears in the B.Y.U. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
Adam Schiff’s remarks at the Brookings Institution last week: Christopher Kojm and Adam Klein contrasted the 9/11 Commission investigation with the HPSCI investigation to demonstrate how bipartisanship should work on an intelligence committee, while Jack Goldsmith provided counter arguments to Susan Hennessey and Ben Wittes’s post on the need for a select committee on the Russia connection. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm
The Times tells us that those calling for Nunes’s recusal including Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and HPSCI Ranking Member Adam Schiff. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 4:55 am
As the hearing was taking place, Quinta Jurecic, Ben, and Susan Hennessey posted video and a live-blog of the hearing, and after it Ben explained how we should read Comey’s testimony. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 11:25 am
Ranking Member of HPSCI Representative Adam Schiff denounced the move, saying that Nunes had failed to inform the other members of the committee before going public and that the Chairman was attempting to “choke off information. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:16 am
Ben and Jack posted a re [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 1:54 pm
(Ben has just posted some thoughts on the matter here.) [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 6:55 am
Comey confirms that Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, Ben Rhodes, Sally Yates by the nature of their positions would have had access to the information. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
CNN adds that HPSCI Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) said in a statement to the press today that neither he nor ranking member Adam Schiff (D-CA) have seen any evidence to support the claim. [read post]
