Search for: "Ben Johnson, III"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2017, 1:23 pm
Johnson 4. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
Trump’s second executive order (which is summarized here for Lawfare by Helen Klein Murillo and analyzed by Ben here) included substantial revisions. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 2:38 pm
Johnson 4. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
David Bergenfeld Laura Lang This past year was a very eventful one in the world of fidelity bond, commercial crime, and cybercrime coverages. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:30 am
III. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Dempsey m2dempsey Villanova Stephen Diamond StephenFDiamond Santa Clara Darby Dickerson darbydickerson Texas Tech Amy Dillard adillard Baltimore Paul Diller dilleradollar Willamette Jim Dimitri profdimitri Indiana-McKinney John DiPippa jmdipippa Arkansas-Little Rock Scott Dodson ProfDodson Hastings Sean Patrick Donlon spdonlan Limerick (Ireland) Fiona Donson Fdonson Univ College Cork Richard Dooling RichardDooling Nebrask Josh Douglas JoshuaADouglas Kentucky Randy Dryer medialawguy Utah Mary… [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
’ The classic action of passing off is based on the trinity of (i) goodwill, (ii) misrepresentation to the public, and (iii) damage to the claimant, as was reaffirmed in the 'Jif Lemon' case (Reckitt & Colman Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] UKHL 12). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
Circuit case of Johnson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Johnson’s November, 2012 speech at the Oxford Union. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 7:31 pm
In their paper, Bobby, Jack, Matt, and Ben (who we will refer to for simplicity’s sake as “CGWW”) argue for a new statutory framework for “next-generation terrorist threats. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:06 pm
She scored interviews with our own John Bellinger III, Ben Wittes, and Andrea Prasow of Human Rights Watch. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:47 pm
., Johnson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm
To its credit, the government never advanced such a categorical and sweeping argument, probably because, inter alia, it suffers from three distinct—but equally fundamental—flaws: First, this argument, which is predicated on Johnson v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:09 am
Discussing the grant at the Volokh Conspiracy, Jonathan Adler notes that “thus far, the Roberts Court has stood pat on standing, neither raising nor lowering the hurdles to Article III standing. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Among the important questions that will need to be answered in connection with the current wave of failed bank litigation is the question of extent to which the non-director officers will be able to defend themselves in reliance on the business judgment rule. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
III. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 2:46 am
But then they switch to the active voice: “We respond expeditiously”—a phrase directly from the safe harbor provisions of the Copyright Act (especially 512(c)(1)(A)(iii) and 512(c)(1)(C) for those who are reading along)—“to requests [i.e., DMCA notices] to remove such content from our services” and “have been improving our procedures over time” the most prominent of which is ContentID on YouTube that figures large in the… [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am
The ethical and legal issues are this: it has nothing to do with the debate between Johnson and Koh, but a higher level. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 6:55 am
Thus, everyone understood that the effect of convicting Andrew Johnson was to make Ben Wade President.Thus, Wade's proposal, and the reasons he gave for it, mattered a lot to the people he was speaking to. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE III Except as otherwise provided in the present Treaty, the requested State shall extradite a person accused or convicted of any crime or offense enumerated in Article II only when both of the following conditions exist: 1. [read post]
