Search for: "Bennett v. US" Results 21 - 40 of 1,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
It comes on the heels of new guidance from the ICO on biometric use in the workplace. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:25 am by Holly
 For more information on how Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig can help you with your legal needs, contact us by calling 800-747-9354 or emailing clientservices@dbllawyers.com. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Plaintiff authors are suing large language model provider OpenAI and related entities for copyright infringement, alleging that plaintiffs’ books were used to train ChatGPT. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The consultation focuses on the size of the services covered and what uses are being targeted. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
 [Tracy] Bennett chooses her words about six weeks in advance, using a random-number generator associated with each word in the database to generate a week’s worth of Wordles. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
He has urged US Congress to take “immediate action” by making a simple clarification that publishers should be compensated for the use of their content in the training and output of generative AI tools and that licensing deals must be struck for onward future use. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Holly
To learn about how Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig can assist you with your legal needs, contact us by calling 800-747-9354 or by emailing clientservices@dbllawyers.com. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
  In Anderson v Anderson, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246131, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
In these circumstances, it was not a good use of the courts resources for the claim to be reinstated [65]. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Bennett, 531 U.S. 4, 8 (2000); Pace v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 21 November 2023, Counsel for the claimants in Lawrence & Ors v Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) told the High Court that they intend to ask ministers for permission to use confidential Leveson Inquiry documents in their legal action against the publisher of the Daily Mail. [read post]