Search for: "Bentley v. Bentley"
Results 21 - 40
of 231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2021, 6:29 pm
For those who can make it, the online pre-program is available via Zoom:ç Online Pre-program ALGORITHMIC LAW AND SOCIETY SYMPOSIUMWEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2021; 3.30.pm – 5.00pmChair: Pedro Rubim Borges Fortes, UFRJPaper: “Regulation and Human Rights in ASEAN’s Smart Cities Network: Promise and the Perils”, Alice de Jonge (Monash University)Paper: “Toward A Practical Legal Rule… [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 2:00 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:23 am
In referring to this case, the appellants submitted that it had been wrongly decided because it was inconsistent with Radcliffe v Bartholomew [1892] 1 QB 161 and was disapproved in both Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 2 QB135 and Pritam Kaur v S Russell and Sons [1973] QB 336. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 1:59 am
I've seen them as an intervenor in the Nokia v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
But at least it compensated Bentley Clothing and its lawyers for having to extend themselves in defending an unjust and unjustifiable litigation power play The post Bentley v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
Bentley v Bentley: Clothing beats Motors again in the Court of AppealBentley Motors Limited v (1) Bentley 1962 Limited (2) Brandlogic Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 1726 (December 2020) This was the first ever case featured in Retromark and turned up again in Volume 7. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm
White House press secretary Jen Psaki affirmed President Biden’s commitment to codifying Roe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
It held that contrary to Matter of Barbara T. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:08 am
They relied upon the Court of Appeal authority of Pritam Kaur v S Russell and Sons [1973] QB 336 and the first instance decision in Marren v Dawson Bentley & Co Ltd [1961] 2 QB135, which established that where a cause of action accrues part way through a day, that day should be excluded for limitation purposes. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:09 pm
The case of Doppes v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:09 pm
The case of Doppes v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:09 pm
The case of Doppes v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Amazingly no one died, but 35-year old Michigan Congressman Alvin Bentley, who was shot in the chest, “was never really the same. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:31 pm
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison and Arnold and Mr Justice Marcus Smith) Bentley Motors Limited v Bentley 1962 Limited and another [2020] EWCA Civ 1726 (16 Dec2020)This was an appeal by Bentley Motors Limited against Judge Hacon's decision in Bentley 1962 Ltd and another v Bentley Motors Ltd [2019] EWHC 2925 (Ch) (1 Nov 2019) which I discussed in Trade Marks - Bentley 1962 Ltd [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:56 pm
First, we heard closing args in the Fairbairn v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 9 November 2020, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Wan-Bissaka & anr v Bentley. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
On 2 November 2020, Nicol J handed down judgment in Depp v News Group Newspapers ([2020] EWHC 2911 (QB)). [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:18 am
The most recent published case on this issue is Bentley v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:05 am
Google (a consumer class like Bentley) and two app developer cases, Pure Sweat Basketball v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Balkin, Obergefell v. [read post]
