Search for: "Berry v. Department of Justice" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (B) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14-15 Nov 2017. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Justice Department (DOJ) jointly issued merger guidelines, supplanting 2023’s draft guidelines, the 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, and the 2020 (partially withdrawn) Vertical Merger Guidelines. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:47 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In Worbes Corp. v Sebrow (74 Misc 3d 1229 [A] [Sup Ct, Bronx County 2022]), Justice Fidel E. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Guest on the Michael Berry Show (KTRH) to discuss Remain in Mexico Policy (Mar. 11, 2020). [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s decision this week to review Husted v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Quoted in How the Biden Justice Department is Untangling the Legal Fights it Inherited From Trump, National Law Journal (Feb. 26, 2021) (Also available here). [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 10:00 pm
They have been an ideology-driven sham and they have proven the wisdom of Justice Douglas' prediction in Lathrop v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Michael Horowitz, Justice Department inspector general. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am by Aaron L. Nielson
’ We agree with the learned trial justice that the proposed testimony was irrelevant. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:58 am
State of Indiana - "Charles Brown appeals his conviction of attempted obstruction of justice. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
Berry on some forthcoming patent cases coming before the US Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:56 am
 Back on PatLit, David Berry considers liability for "divided" patent infringement -- and how a recent US Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit decision in BMC v Paymentech has avoided tackling it full-on. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
The Schwab case represents the latest showdown over whether pending executions should be postponed until after the Supreme Court has heard and decided the Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]