Search for: "Beverly, Appeal of"
Results 21 - 40
of 669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2021, 5:04 pm
“Judge to leave Atlanta appeals court, giving President Biden a vacancy to fill”: Bill Rankin of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has an article that begins, “Judge Beverly Martin has informed the White House she will leave the federal appeals court in Atlanta, giving President Joe Biden his first vacancy to fill here. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:48 am
The Court of Appeal affirmed. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
" On December 19, 2008, the Fourth Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal in Party City v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:27 pm
The issue is currently pending in the Fourth District of the California Court of Appeal on a writ in Party City Corp. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 4:30 pm
Beverly appealed. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 3:31 pm
When Judge Beverly B. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:53 am
Reading the statute as a whole, the Court of Appeal held that Song-Beverly applies only at the point of sale, not when merchandise is returned by a customer. [read post]
10 May 2018, 12:27 pm
"Thankfully, the Court of Appeal reverses. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 5:50 am
In this case, the Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition (“OSCC”) and the State of Oregon appealed a judgment entered in a writ-of review proceeding that affirmed Clatsop County’s determination that Gary and Beverly Aspmo had a vested right under Measure 49 to complete a 15-lot subdivision on their property. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
I first met Beverly Brazauskas in the late 1980s, when she was the Assistant Director of Religious Education at the Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Indiana. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:55 am
In Beverly v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 12:07 pm
The Court of Appeal noted that three recent decisions have addressed the precise issue presented here, and that each of held that Song-Beverly does not apply to requests for refunds in connection with the return of merchandise but, rather, only at the point of sale. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 6:47 am
On Jan. 24, 2007, the Court of Appeals issued a 3-0 NFP opinion in the case: In Re the Visitation of M.S. and K.S. by Next Best Friend Beverly R. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:28 am
On May 22, 2008, the California Court of Appeal narrowed the scope of claims available under California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971, California Civil Code § 1747.08, ruling that the statute is subject to the one-year statute of limitations of Code of Civil Procedure section 340 and does not apply to merchandise returns.California Civil Code § 1747.08 prohibits a retailer that accepts credit cards from, among other things, requesting, or… [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:06 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Stayart v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 6:36 am
A new class action article, summarizing the recent California Court of Appeal opinion discussing California's Song-Beverly Act, will be published tomorrow. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
The Commonwealth appealed this ruling but The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court agreed that the Beverly police officer was entitled to a new trial. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:05 am
The trial court sustained the demurrer, and the Court of Appeal affirmed based, in part, on Party City Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:00 am
The trial court sustained the demurrer, and the Court of Appeal affirmed based, in part, on Party City Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 9:03 pm
The district court granted summary judgment to the Defendant on all claims, and the Plaintiffs appealed. [read post]
