Search for: "Black v. F"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
§ 1881a(f)(2)(C), (D). [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:39 pm
The New York Times [unpaywalled]: “Four in 10 illegal gun cases tracked by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives were involved in black market sales, including from shadow dealers who used a legal loophole to evade background checks, according to an analysis of firearms trafficking released on Thursday. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The “predatory inclusion” tactics that certain crypto entities are directing at Black, brown, and other marginalized communities are extremely troubling.[16] Here, I’m talking about the familiar (but so far unsupported) narratives that crypto will increase financial inclusion;[17] that it will uplift the unbanked or underbanked; and that it will help them build wealth and increase upward mobility. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
William F. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:30 pm
’” Terry Black’s Barbecue, L.L.C. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:44 am
” Cavitt v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:27 am
Papish v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
See James v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:23 pm
Computer Packages, Inc., 694 F.3d 10 (Fed. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:10 am
Casella v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:23 am
From an amicus brief in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:24 pm
” (see also Hoechst-Roussel Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:51 am
Pfizer Inc., 646 F. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 8:09 am
Zion Bank v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Black (S.D.N.Y. 2023) to support its position, that case is readily distinguishable. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 1:11 pm
Bonds in Bonds v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Brandeis, and Harlan F. [read post]
