Search for: "Black v. Turner"
Results 21 - 40
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2021, 6:57 pm
"Afro-Atlantic Memories" is the result of 8 years of research dedicated to the study of the collection (sound recordings, photographs) in candomblé terreiros, in Bahia, in 1940/41, by the American black linguist Lorenzo Dow Turner and the process of reappropriation of this collection by the candomblé communities in Bahia, including the descendants of Menininha do Gantois, Joaozinho da Goméia and Manoel Falefa. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
However, even if the letter of intent is a contract, it may be subject to a panoply of classical contract defenses such as the statute of frauds[8] (discussed later) and the parol evidence rule.[9][10] If the letter of intent is not a contract but nonetheless induced action or forbearance of the other party, it may be subject to a claim of promissory estoppel,[11] except that letters of intent which contain language that is expressly nonbinding may prevent plaintiffs from establishing… [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:31 pm
This may require security officers to remain on the premises and on call during paid rest periods, and to carry and monitor a communication device… it is the intent of the Legislature to abrogate, for the security services industry only, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Augustus v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Perhaps it is relevant that I read it in two sittings; it is a real page-turner, written with brio as Jack presents a remarkably comprehensive overview of what he discerns as various cycles in American politics (importantly including the Supreme Court and the development of constitutional doctrine) from literally the beginning of the new national government in 1789 to the present. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
To determine whether a detainee’s constitutional rights have been violated by a jail or prison, the court applies the “legitimate penological purposes” test from Turner v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:06 pm
(Compare Jeffries v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:47 am
Gardella v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Anderson, Rashawn Ray, Nicol Turner Lee and Jon Valent, and will be moderated by Elaine Kamarck. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm
West and Nicol Turner Lee for a panel discussion. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 8:23 am
Hayleigh Bosher reviews Jacob Turner’s book, 'Robot Rules, Regulating Artificial Intelligence'. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
In Frese v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
” The Legislature has concluded that these policies “have a disparate impact on Black individuals as these policies are more likely to deter Black applicants and burden or punish Black employees than any other group. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
”Kimberly Welch, Vanderbilt University (kimberly.m.welch@vanderbilt.edu) Assistant Professor“The Black Atlantic Economy. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Scripps NP Operating dba The Corpus Christi Caller-Times v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that in:finding the government failed to ‘prov[e] that Turner [Broadcasting]’s post-merger negotiating position would materially increase based on its ownership by AT&T,’ . . . [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that in:finding the government failed to ‘prov[e] that Turner [Broadcasting]’s post-merger negotiating position would materially increase based on its ownership by AT&T,’ . . . [read post]
