Search for: "Black v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission"
Results 21 - 40
of 120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), that the SEC’s ability to recover funds through disgorgement is subject to a five-year statute of limitations. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making-- The Administrative Branches: The Non-Delegation Doctrine, An Introduction.Notes for--Mistretta v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:06 am
V. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:11 pm
Over the week of Nov. 12, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), which Congress created to hear appeals from military commissions such as the one in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
As is customary, my remarks this morning are in my official capacity as Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission, the Commissioners, or other members of the staff. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:15 pm
In McNally v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
It appears that Fokker deliberately misused this exception to justify shipments from the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm
Similarly, a group of former national security officials write that unchecked firearms access in the United States is a threat to national security, both foreign and domestic. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:42 am
Laborers District Council — proof needed in a private lawsuit by an investor claiming that a registration statement filed at the Securities and Exchange Commission was untrue Tuesday, November 4 Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:02 am
Fiero v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:02 am
Fiero v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:20 am
Black v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 5:56 am
Then, when the Supreme Court effectively confirmed that CIA black sites were unlawful in 2006 by ruling in Hamdan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
Yesterday, the European Commission said it was in close contact with Lithuania and other member states and working on additional guidelines on applying E.U. sanctions. [read post]
