Search for: "Blackmore v. Blackmore" Results 21 - 37 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Blackmore Rule has outlived its usefulness and should no longer be referred to. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:12 am
I don’t entirely agree with him — I’m one of the few people who thinks Buckley v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:04 pm
Mike Mireless explains the test in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
Pumfrey J has previously said (in Quads 4 Kids v Campbell [2006] EWHC 2482 (Ch)) that a Vero notice is "a clear arguable threat" and granted an interim injunction on this basis.More recently, (in Cassie Creations v Blackmore and Mirrorkool [2014] EWHC2941 (Ch) and T&A Textiles and Hosiery Limited v Hala Textile UK Limited[2015] EWHC 2888) it was suggested that arguing that an eBay Vero notice may be a threat is persuasive. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 9:17 pm
Blackmore  (1995), 122 D.L.R. (4th) 330, 2 B.C.L.R. (3d) 201 (C.A.) at para. 28;  Vukelic v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:09 am by emagraken
Blackmore (1995), 2 B.C.L.R. (3d) 201 at para. 28 (C.A.); •     “[E]ncouraging litigants to settle whenever possible, thus freeing up judicial resources for other cases”:  Bedwell v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:42 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
No. 194798/21722 (Panama); RUC # 2172202194798 (Panama) [SDNT] ESCALONA, Victor Julio, c/o C A V J CORPORATION LTDA., Bogota, Colombia; c/o C.A. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Biological Paternity Isn't Determinative - Cornelio v. [read post]