Search for: "Blake v. Williams"
Results 21 - 40
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2018, 9:32 am
In Thistlethwaite v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:32 am
In Thistlethwaite v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:15 am
Hall Jr., The Ninth Circuit’s Deficient Examination of the Legislative History of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 7:50 am
Though much can be said about the substance of the arguments--particularly Cunningham v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 9:19 am
AEDPA came up again only when the deputy solicitor general for Washington State, William B. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:49 am
In addition to Williams v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Blake McDowell Law Center [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 2:42 pm
As William Blake wrote, "One law for the lion and the ox is oppression. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:21 am
On Thursday I watched closing arguments in the case of Theresa Foster v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:31 pm
Luxottica Group et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:30 am
(See generally Rosenberger v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:19 pm
For example, I wish the Court might be willing to reconsider its now 60-year-old sentencing due process ruling in Williams v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:06 pm
Pfaff v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:36 pm
Have a great weekend and we leave you with one of our favourite songs of our youth; (well more like Stan Blake's youth): CAPTAIN OUT .....Captain4Justice@gmail.comSite Feed [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
“The mere presence of [other safety devices] somewhere at the work site” does not satisfy defendant’s duty to provide appropriate safety devices (Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts, 65 NY2d 513, 524, rearg denied 65 NY2d 1054; see Williams v City of Niagara Falls, 43 AD3d 1426; Whiting v Dave Hennig, Inc., 28 AD3d 1105, 1106). [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:47 am
William L. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:17 am
Since the plaintiff had an interest in the legal malpractice cause of action “as of the commencement of the case” (11 USC § 541[a][1]), we agree with the Supreme Court’s conclusion that the cause of action was property of the bankruptcy estate and that the plaintiff lacked the legal capacity to sue on that cause of action (see Williams v Stein, 6 AD3d 197, 198; Osborne v Tulis [In re Osborne], 2013 US Dist LEXIS 190402, *7-8; see also… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:32 pm
Blake). [read post]
