Search for: "Block v. County of Person"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
” Chase’s concern in that case was the prospect of courts being asked to remove persons from office on grounds that they are Section-3-disqualified. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm
There is a hearing in Westmoreland County about this in April 2022. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Hare coursing was made illegal in 2004 under the Hunting Act however it still takes place across many counties. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:38 am
W. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Loudon County School Board (E.D. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:51 am
"] From Siewert v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 1:34 pm
Under Terry v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
Block v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
Block v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
The court partially blocked Smith’s effort in a ruling that relied on the Constitution’s “speech or debate” clause. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
Citrus County School Board, 25 So.3d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) Petition for Benefits. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:16 pm
Dalton v Forhousing Ltd (Manchester County Court, 19 June 2023 – copy of the judgment here ). [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Arizona – Two Groups Making New Bid to Hide Names of Donors in Political Races Arizona Capitol Times – Howard Fischer (Capitol News Services) | Published: 11/7/2023 Attorney Scott Freeman acknowledges that Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Scott McCoy rejected his bid to void Proposition 211. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 11:39 am
Lindke v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:41 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Sanders applied the principle of one-person-one-v [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:18 am
" Saxe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
The County Attorney acknowledged that Hill may be on the chopping block, but it was still good law. [read post]