Search for: "Blue Williams, LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
” In a very big case that had divided the music industry, music experts, musicologists and indeed legal commentators, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the 2015 jury verdict which found that Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams' 2013 hit 'Blurred Lines' had infringed on the copyright in Marvin Gaye's 1977 song 'Got To Give It Up'. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Adam Feldman
The post Empirical SCOTUS: Getting rid of those amicus blues appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Project Blue Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 28 Feb-1 Mar 2018. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Project Blue Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 28 Feb-1 Mar 2018. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Project Blue Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 28 Feb-1 Mar 2018. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Project Blue Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 28 Feb-1 Mar 2018. [read post]
5 May 2018, 6:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
– En ese mismo año (2014), Franklin Funds y Oppenheimer y Blue Mountain Capital Management LLC, instaron un pleito en el Tribunal Federal para el Distrito de Puerto Rico, impugnando la validez constitucional de dicha ley. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Project Blue Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 28 Feb-1 Mar 2018. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
The key provisions of the 1933 Act are Section 11, which establishes that any purchaser of a security may bring a private action for damages against the issuer if the registration statement is false or misleading,[3] and Section 12(a)(2), which similarly establishes a private right of action against any person who offers or sells a security through a prospectus or oral communication that is false or misleading.[4] The key provision of the 1934 Act is Section 10(b), which, along with Securities and… [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Project Blue Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 28 Feb-1 Mar 2018. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Project Blue Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 28 Feb-1 Mar 2018. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
” ICOs: Blue Sky Cops Are On the Crypto Beat This Cleary blog says that it isn’t just the SEC that’s on the prowl for rogue coin deals – the blue sky folks are getting into the game as well. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
” ICOs: Blue Sky Cops Are On the Crypto Beat This Cleary blog says that it isn’t just the SEC that’s on the prowl for rogue coin deals – the blue sky folks are getting into the game as well. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Project Blue Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 28 Feb-1 Mar 2018. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Project Blue Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 28 Feb-1 Mar 2018. [read post]