Search for: "Bodnar v. Bodnar"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court decision known as Chevron v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:30 pm
The 2009 Supreme Court decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:08 am
” “Here, even accepting the facts alleged in the complaint, as amplified by the plaintiff’s affidavit, as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87), the plaintiff failed to plead specific factual allegations demonstrating that, but for the defendants’ alleged negligence, there would have been a more favorable outcome on his workers’ compensation claim (see Katsoris v… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:35 pm
Terry, Afghanistan’s Civil War (1979-1989): Illegal and Failed Foreign Interventions Salvatore Fabio Nicolosi, The Law of Military Occupation and the Role of de Jure and de Facto Sovereignty Serena Forlati, The Legal Obligation to Prevent Genocide: Bosnia v Serbia and Beyond Micha? [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:34 pm
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED SINCE THE CASE OF BODNAR V. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:30 am
Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506). [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:42 am
The plaintiff merely alleged that had the defendant shared with him information imparted by Ameriprise’s attorney concerning the low rate of success of challenges to note collection proceedings, he would have insisted on settlement discussions (see Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506; Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 909; see also Bauza v Livington, 40 AD3d 791, 793). [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:43 am
Here, the complaint failed to plead specific factual allegations demonstrating that, but for the defendants’ alleged negligence, there would have been a more favorable outcome in the underlying action or that the plaintiff would not have incurred any damages (see Williams v Silverstone, 215 AD3d 787, 789; Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d 1504, 1506). [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:28 am
The defendants also failed to demonstrate that their actions were protected by the attorney judgment rule (see generally Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738; Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1505). [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:22 am
Bodnar, 2006 BCSC 787 at para. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:51 pm
Related RegBlog Coverage Redistricting Law Refined Tuesday, July 19, 2016 | Daniel Tokaji The Supreme Court case, Harris v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:22 am
Here, the complaint failed to plead specific factual allegations demonstrating that, but for the defendants’ alleged negligence, there would have been a more favorable outcome in the underlying action or that the plaintiff would not have incurred any damages (see Williams v Silverstone, 215 AD3d 787, 789 [2023]; Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d 1504, 1506 [2020]). [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
Schwartzman, Inc. at 704; Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 A.D.3d1504 [2d Dept. 2020}; Gall v Colon;.Sylvain, 151 A.D.3d 698 [2d Dept. 2017]). [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:20 pm
"There as some exceptions to this general rule, however.PERB, relying on the Court of Appeals ruling in Freudenthal v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:03 am
In Bodnar v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:38 am
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Caleb Trotter looks at Lee v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:30 pm
In today’s case (Bodnar v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:26 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:04 am
Justice Hennessy relied on Hechevarria v Reale and Fish v Shainhouse (below) in calculating the value of the FLA claims. $30,000 each Wilcox v “Miss Megan” (The), 2007 FC 1004, 2007 CarswellNat 3324 (FC), aff’d 2008 FC 56, 2008 CarswellNat 1193 (FC). [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 8:53 am
Stell v Obedkoff, [2000] OTC 742, 2000 CarswellOnt 4085 (Ont Sup Ct J). [read post]
