Search for: "Boe v. Boe" Results 21 - 40 of 676
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing requirements that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:10 pm by Geoff Schweller
” The settlement stems from a qui tam whistleblower suit filed by former employees of Boeing involved in composites fabrication and autoclave operations within the V-22 program. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:53 am by luiza
The whistleblowers in this case are former Boeing employees who worked in composites fabrication and autoclave operations with the V-22 program. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Or so said the Texas Court of Appeals (Amarillo) in Boes v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 12:02 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
This was the question of first impression addressed by the Court of Appeals of Texas in its recent opinion in Boes v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
That may be because with this decision and earlier decisions in Marchand and In re Boeing Co. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 10:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
” Judge Pitman also rejected the plaintiff’s attempt to rely on the Seventh Circuit’s 2022 decision in Seafarers Pension Plan on behalf of Boeing v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:37 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
  Country of origin: new European applications in 2022 v opt-outs   Technology fields Looking at the first International Patent Classification of each opted-out patent or application, the IPC covering preparations for medical purposes, A61K, took the prize for first place with 22,810 cases. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:40 pm by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  Faced with no Illinois law directly on point, the federal court determined that the reasoning in  Haley v. [read post]