Search for: "Bolds v. Department of Revenue"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
Prince v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:24 am
Although courts have the equitable power to correct “a mistake solely in the reduction of an agreement to writing” (Stang LLC v Hudson Sq. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
I have no doubt that there will be those, in head offices and in PR departments, who long for global brands which will deliver their equivalents of Coca-Cola and Macdonald’s. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm
The Roberts Court has ruled against tribal interests on numerous occasions, although admittedly the language and tenor of the decision last year in Michigan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm
Kerner v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
(Heilpern & Worley, at 23 (bold added).) [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
[Editor Charlie sez: This post demonstrates that no single songwriter group–including NSAI–speaks for every songwriter in the world and that songwriters around the world do not want their incomes smashed. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:15 am
The NFLPA then amended its bylaws to prohibit collective bargaining with the teams and filed requests with the Department of Labor and the Internal Revenue Service to be reclassified as no longer being a union. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
In January 1952, a former collector of internal revenue for the District of Massachusetts, Denis W. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
All explicable reactions to law department buying behavior. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
Some law professors and externship directors are using blogging to enhance their classes.[24] Some career-services departments advise students not only to remove embarrassing social-media content but to affirmatively establish a positive web presence.[25] And of course law professors have been blogging and debating the merits of blogging as legal scholarship for many years.[26] This article focuses on blogging by practicing lawyers and law students seeking a career in law practice as… [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
The 10% increase in the state share of the recovery corresponds to a 10% reduction in the federal share.[4]The Fiscal and Policy Note analysis provided an illustration of how a DRA-compliant act would benefit the state:State Fiscal Effect: To the extent that the bill is approved by the Office of the Inspector General at the federal Department of Health and Human Services, DHMH special fund revenues increase under the bill beginning as early as fiscal 2011 due to increased fraud… [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
Be bold, but watch yourself, folks. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
It is only in the most serious and clearest of cases that these extensive reviews make feasible sense—as a matter of practicality and as a matter of efficient expenditure of taxpayer revenues. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
It is only in the most serious and clearest of cases that these extensive reviews make feasible sense—as a matter of practicality and as a matter of efficient expenditure of taxpayer revenues. [read post]
