Search for: "Bond v. Phillips"
Results 21 - 40
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2018, 5:54 pm
Constr., Inc. v Cortland Paving Co., Inc., 55 AD3d 1106, 1107 [2008]; Phillips v Catania, 155 AD2d 866, 866 [1989]), the "notice shall include the name of the [entity] providing storage of the motor vehicle, the amount being claimed for such storage, and [the] address and times at which the motor vehicle may be recovered" (Lien Law § 184 [5]). [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Cty. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Cty. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 4:32 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie suggests that a new lawsuit against Colorado civil rights officials by cake artist Jack Phillips, who prevailed in last term’s Masterpiece Cakeshop case “because [the Supreme Court] saw signs that the Colorado civil-rights commission was overtly hostile toward [Phillips’] religious beliefs,” indicates that Phillips’ “conscience bars him from creating a much wider… [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:40 am
Payton v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:15 pm
Hawaii v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The Cases of the Day, NML Capital, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:41 pm
The biggest problem with Alice’s case (presented by Carter Phillips) is its similarity to Bilski v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary contribution of its revenues… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary contribution of its revenues… [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:18 am
Rupp v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:19 pm
In 1998, the State of Texas sued the Big Four tobacco manufacturers – Phillip Morris, R.J. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
Phillips’s victory would mean much for long. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am
Katz, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Palo Alto, CA Right now we’re in a complete mess; nobody knows what the law is. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
29 May 2008, 9:15 am
Supreme Court ruling in his case, House v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:18 am
" Phillips Elecs. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:18 am
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; David L. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:03 pm
FCC v. [read post]
