Search for: "Borders v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 6,300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2024, 10:13 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In addition, it analyses how the Brussels IIb Regulation optimises the provisions of the 1980 Hague Convention on International Child Abduction between the member states of the European Union. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:00 am by Rogier Bartels
In R v Gul, it noted “that insurgents in non-international armed conflicts do not enjoy combatant immunity” (para. 50). [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:06 am by Melanie O'Brien
The ICJ CERD Cases Two cases brought under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), Armenia v Azerbaijan and Azerbaijan v Armenia, are relevant, both of which center on Nagorno-Karabakh. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:55 am by Yousuf Syed Khan
” Similarly, on Oct. 18, 2023, Netanyahu stated that Israel would not allow humanitarian assistance from Israel’s border crossing points “in the form of food and medicines” into Gaza, “as long as our hostage [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
(see Murray v Express [2009] Ch 481, para 36) The only considerations which tell against such an expectation is the fact that the children are arriving publicly, at a border, to seek refuge. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”It is hard to counter that view when Justices like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito flaunt their political sympathies or when the Court trashed its own precedents on the way to overturning Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
   Particularly in the wake of the Hamas-led butchering, raping, and kidnapping of civilians – including Americans – living peacefully within Israel's 1948 borders, the Harvard letter truly disgusted me. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]