Search for: "Boston v. Board of Education" Results 21 - 40 of 249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of Boston (1st Cir. 1998) (noting "it is enough that the official be involved in policy, even if only as an adviser, implementer, or spokesperson"); Brown v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Now I live in a suburb close to Boston, Massachusetts, and work at an educational institution in the heart of the city—one block from the State Capitol Building. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 8:07 am by ernst
Board of Education and Emmet Till’s murder, but also the emergence of Martin Luther King, Jr. as a national leader, the birth of the sit-in movement, and the Presidential election of 1960. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
The Perpetrators also represented to the Migrants that if they “were willing to board airplanes to other states, they would receive employment, housing, educational opportunities, and other like assistance at their arrival. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am by Dan Lopez
Antitrust Matters provides engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group,… [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group,… [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group,… [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group,… [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Remarkably, there are state and federal court judges who continue to misunderstand and misinterpret regulatory risk assessments, notwithstanding efforts to educate the judiciary. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Moms for Liberty, a controversial Florida-based political action group started by two former school board members and a Republican activist, has made parental rights its rallying cry and is hoping to harness anger over mask mandates and diversity education in schools into power at the polls. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 12:42 pm by Lincoln Caplan
Board of Education, the totemic ruling about school desegregation, outlawed racial discrimination, whether benign or invidious. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Next Friday, January 21st, the Supreme Court will consider whether to take up that question in the case of Pollreis v. [read post]