Search for: "Bounds v. Commonwealth" Results 21 - 40 of 244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:20 pm by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
It’s also worth noting that in another relatively recent decision, Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:20 pm by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
It’s also worth noting that in another relatively recent decision, Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:40 am by Rosalind English
Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Secretary of State for Defence  [2011] EWCA Civ 1540  - read judgment A Pakistani detainee was sufficiently in the control of the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and the Secretary of State for Defence to support the issue of a writ of habeas corpus, and it should not be withheld on any grounds concerned with diplomatic relations. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:10 pm by Gideon
The Commonwealth will attempt to prove that the gunshot wound suffered by Barclay in ‘66 – which left him wheelchair bound – caused the urinary tract infection in 2006 that ultimately killed him. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Even if substantive consolidation proves unavailable, the oversight board or the Commonwealth may still seek to confirm a joint plan of adjustment for the Commonwealth and related issuers of Commonwealth debt by using PROMESA’s incorporated cramdown power, arguing that it can be imposed on all holders of Commonwealth debt so long as one impaired class of creditors of a single Commonwealth issuer votes to approve the plan. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 6:42 am by John H Curley
Accordingly, the District's argument is without merit.The Court's opinion in Franklin Regional School District v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania rules against Club Kama Sutra in dispute with city of Philadelphia5-5-2008 Pennsylvania:A divided Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has ruled in favor of old-fashioned dining etiquette, ruling that sexual activity is not an accessory use to a restaurant.The split seven-judge panel upheld a trial court's ruling against Club Kama Sutra in Philadelphia.In MAJ Entertainment Inc. v. the City of Philadelphia, the panel consisting of… [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:34 am by Matt Cameron
Unfortunately for Melendez-Diaz, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts had already squarely addressed this issue in Commonwealth v. [read post]