Search for: "Bourke v. United States"
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 2:51 pm
According to Sixth Circuit, the man-woman marriage laws in these states did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment—even in the wake of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Snyder (Michigan), and Bourke v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
” Coker v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm
The U.S. case is U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled, in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:42 am
Rept. 100-576, at 921 (1988). [7] United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Snyder (Michigan), and Bourke v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
Snyder, 14-571 (Michigan), and Bourke v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm
The merits brief filed in the Kentucky case (Bourke v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm
They are plaintiffs in Bourke v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Snyder, 14-571 (Michigan), and Bourke v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
The TDRA establishes that “[a] famous mark is one that ‘is widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On 21 July 2022, the BBC offered a public apology and agreed to pay damages to the former nanny of Prince William and Prince Harry following the “fabricated” and “false and malicious” allegations made by Martin Bashir that Tiggy Legge-Bourke, now Alexandra Pettifer, had an affair with Prince Charles, in order to secure his world-famous 1995 interview with Princess Diana. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
DPPA was initially introduced in the House of Representatives on March 30, 2006 and would amend title 17, section 2 of the United States Code, by expanding the term, "design," to include "fashion design" and affording protection to fashion designs.[9] An identical bill was also introduced in the Senate on August 2, 2007.[10] DPPA would essentially extend protection to the appearance as a whole of an article of apparel, including its ornamentation, with apparel… [read post]
