Search for: "Brad Rostolsky" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2014, 11:13 am by Lisa Baird
Reed Smith partner Brad Rostolsky strives to answer this question in “HIPAA Enforcement: The Next Step,” an interview and accompanying article that appeared on HealthcareInfoSecurity on October 14th. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:16 am by Lisa Baird
According to “New Jersey Requires Encryption for Health Insurance Carriers; May Open Door to Class Action Suits over Violations Under State Consumer Protection Law,” a post on Reed Smith’s Global Regulatory Enforcement Law Blog written by partners Paul Bond and Brad Rostolsky, the established connection between this new law and the NJCFA means that health insurance carriers should follow its requirements closely in order to avoid possible violations and fines. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm by Lisa Baird
Authors Brad Rostolsky, Nan Bonifant and Jen Pike discuss this case and what local and county governments need to be aware of in order to comply with HIPAA regulations. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm by Lisa Baird
This post was authored by Brad Rostolsky and Jennifer Pike. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 1:13 pm by Lisa Baird
As outlined in “Are You Prepared if the Next Big HIPAA Breach Happens to You,” Reed Smith attorney Brad Rostolsky outlines the key steps providers should take to ensure they are appropriately prepared: Be prepared to respond quickly Get the right (internal and external) team in place Make sure there is insurance for everything Pick the low-hanging fruit For more details on these key steps, read the full article. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:36 am by Lisa Baird
This post was written by Jennifer Pike and Brad Rostolsky The Privacy and Security Tiger Team (“Tiger Team”), a subcommittee of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT’s HIT Policy Committee, has recommended that the Office for Civil Rights of U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 12:57 pm by Lisa Baird
Reed Smith attorney, Brad Rostolsky was recently quoted in an article discussing the case, articulating his belief that the government will continue to be aggressive in its enforcement of “meaningful use” EHR attestations in circumstances that warrant a tough approach. [read post]