Search for: "Brennan v. CIR"
Results 21 - 40
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:51 am
In a recent Just Security article (the first in a series on foreign intelligence reform) Elizabeth Goitein from the Brennan Center for Justice described Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) as “a go-to domestic spying tool for the FBI” and predicted that this intelligence collection authority, ”will not be renewed without a major overhaul” while describing General Nakasone’s comments as “tone deaf” “boilerplate. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Eubanks, 25 F.4th 414 (6th Cir. 2022). [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:53 am
Brennan, 230 F.3d 65, 70 (2d Cir. 2000). [3] In re Arcapita Bank B.S.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:30 am
Tempe Union High School Dist. (9th Cir. 1998) and Turkish Coalition of Am., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:26 pm
See Dworkin v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
In Club Madonna Inc v City of Miami Beach __ F 4th __ (11th Cir; 1 August 2022), Newsom J (concurring) argued that First Amendment doctrine has too many standards, tests, and factors, and called for a “return to first principles”. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
Over Justice Scalia’s objection, Justice Brennan’s majori [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:34 am
Dep't of Corr. (6th Cir. 2004) (prison security and inmate safety and privacy); see also Reidt v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
That three-Justice opinion (written by Justice Brennan and joined by Justices Marshall and Stevens) stressed that the tax exemption was not a permissible accommodation of religion, because it "burdens nonbeneficiaries markedly"[14] "by increasing their tax bills by whatever amount is needed to offset the benefit bestowed on subscribers to religious publications. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm
Board of Ed., 911 F.2d 882 (3d Cir. 1990). [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:03 am
Plaintiffs rely heavily on the plurality opinion of Justice Brennan in Board of Ed. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Eubanks, 25 F.4th 414 (6th Cir. 2022). [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:53 am
In Brennan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
., Sarafin v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Draft No. 1) [hereinafter cited as Restatement]. [9] Restatement at iv (listing the reporters). [10] See id. at v-vi (listing advisers). [11] See id. at vii-viii (listing members). [12] “‘Sunk costs’ . . . are costs that have already been incurred and do not vary with one’s subsequent actions. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
Justices Brennan, Stevens, and Marshall dissented. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:01 am
Tempe Union High School Dist. (9th Cir. 1998) and Turkish Coalition of Am., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
Citizenship & Immigration Services, 2022 WL 1020379 (2d Cir. [read post]
