Search for: "Breyer Law Offices"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,570
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
We've spotted contributions by Laura Kalman, Justice Stephen Breyer, and Brad Snyder.A note in the Harvard Law Review: Compulsory Voting’s American History. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
" Citing Justice Stevens' dissent in Heller and Justice Breyer's dissent in Bruen, Wilson claims that the U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Respondents "offer no account [or theory] of how their argument fits within the landscape of [the Court's] case law. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm
Breyer. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:08 am
Breyer at the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:58 pm
The post Call for Officer Nominations: Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice (deadline 3/11), by Andrew Emery appeared first on Yale Journal on Regulation. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:02 am
"Each Justice had a three-minute segment to question so if, hypothetically, Justice Breyer talked for 2-and-a-half minutes, I only had 30 seconds to respond. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:19 pm
Breyer, joined by J. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:06 am
Retired Justices Stephen Breyer and David Souter were not present. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Her home was turned in a "makeshift office," and her staff quarantined before entering. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
The Office of the Solicitor General had a much larger argument than she did. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
Breyer at the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
That case involved tribal court jurisdiction over section 1983 claims against state police officers. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Instead, O’Connor applied for a job with the San Mateo County government, where she agreed to work for free until the office could find funding for her. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused registration of “Trump Too Small” under Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act (15 USC 1052(c)) because the phrase includes a living individual’s name without his written consent. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" This is clear content discrimination, since the government can't determine whether movements are "of a sexual nature" without having some revenue officer look at the movements and examine their content. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 712–13 (1997) (Breyer, J., dissenting))) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 pm
That Justice Protasiewicz, who was elected in April after a bitter, partisan statewide contest and who took office last month (giving the progressive wing of the court a 4-3 majority), had when she was running for office called the maps “rigged” and “unfair. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Although Jackson’s meteoric rise took him out of the Antitrust Division in barely more than a year, he persuaded FDR to choose Yale law professor Thurman Arnold as his successor. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
