Search for: "Brian High v. Brian Head"
Results 21 - 40
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 9:31 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am
Howell shared this week’s "Arbiters of Truth" episode of the Lawfare Podcast, in which Evelyn Douek and Quinta Jurecic spoke with David Rolph, professor at the University of Sydney Law School, to discuss the High Court of Australia’s ruling that media outlets can be held liable for defamatory third-party comments on their social media pages: Brian Liu and Raquel Leslie explored the Chinese government’s ban on cryptocurrency, Evergrande crisis and… [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:20 am
Markman, Mary Beth Kelly and Brian K. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:28 am
In Kenya, the High Court dismissed an application for injunction in Netresource Limited v Ministry of Education & 3 others stating that no prima facie case was established. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:11 am
• Rupert Murdoch, the head of News Corp., will appear before Britain's High Court as part of an inquiry ordered by Prime Minister David Cameron to investigate standards in the British press. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:09 pm
Should more students realize that the odds do not favor their obtaining high-paying employment after law school? [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:34 pm
Toxicology reports after the crash had showed minivan driver Diane Schuler was drunk and high when going the wrong way on the Taconic while loaded down with kids, only to slam head-on into an SUV carrying Michael Bastardi Sr., Guy Bastardi and Daniel Longo of Yonkers. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
A trial heard by judge alone continues in the High Court, however. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The High Court has rejected Wikileaks founder Julian Assange’s appeal against extradition to Sweden to face rape and sexual molestation charges. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
As well as sharing David Cameron’s text-speak (lol), Brooks provided the inquiry with an email sent to her by News Corp’s head of communications, Frederic Michel. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
The matter now returns to the High Court for compensation to be determined. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm
The document addresses critics of this provision head-on, contending that those who object that the provision “gives the FBI discretion to conduct surveillance of persons who are not approved targets of court-authorized surveillance” are “wrong. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
Does 1-2 et. al. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 6:18 pm
Cat Zakrzewski and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post report that “Supreme Court hears a case that could transform the internet; Oral arguments begin in Gonzalez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Brian M. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 10:00 pm
The freshness of the 2005 high court case, known as Johanns v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 3:13 am
In his post “The Daily Mail, Leveson and Anonymous Witnesses: Fourt kinds of Hypocrisy” Brian Cathcart suggested “The Mail complaining about anonymity is like a pornographer complaining about decency. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Meanwhile, Brian Pillans, a lecturer in law and journalism at Glasgow Caledonian University, examined the ethical and legal position here. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
As Brian Cathcart commented on Inforrm, the complaint appears to be a waste of time. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
The court begins the opinion by explaining that[o]n June 30, 2015, Brian Dutcher announced on Facebook that he planned to assassinate President Obama. [read post]
