Search for: "Bridges v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2015, 9:00 am by Diana A. Silva
The New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division recently confirmed that the New Jersey Spill Act applies retroactively and abrogates the State of New Jersey’s sovereign immunity for contribution to contamination. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
Shortly after midnight on February 4, 2011, Ronnie Rodd Davis was operating a tractor-trailer, owned by Superior Carriers, on eastbound Interstate 10 near the Atchafalaya Basin Bridge in Baton Rouge. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:41 am by Steven G. Pearl
As anticipated, the Supreme Court of the United States this morning reversed the district court's order in Dukes v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 1:21 am by Patrick Bracher
(Sherry Clemente v New Jersey Transit et al., case number A-2355-12T3, in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division) [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 10:34 am by Steven Koprince
And that finally brings us to the current Court of Federal Claims decision, Superior Optical Labs, Inc., v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:56 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court’s other denial of a significant new case (Center for Competitive Politics v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:50 am by Mack Sperling
App. 16 (1985), the Court held that: [t]he scope of an arbitration award and its res judicata effect are matters for judicial determination; therefore, whether plaintiff's claims are barred was for the superior court to determine. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:35 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases, Jesus Arrieta v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 10:14 am by PaulKostro
., A-3265-08T2, July 29, 2010: Rule 2:2-3(a)(1) provides in pertinent part that “appeals may be taken to the Appellate Division as of right from final judgments of the Superior Court trial divisions. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The famous Charles River Bridge case, for example, was nominally about whether an exclusive license to operate a bridge must remain in perpetuity or could be circumvented when the government licensor found an allegedly superior alternative. [read post]