Search for: "Bridges et al v. United States of America et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
(HERE).The Conference brought together some of the most important and influential thinkers about the fundamentals of law in general, and that of the United States in particular. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
Robert Sherwin’s article Ambiguity in Anti-SLAPP Law and Frivolous Litigation is cited in the following article: George Wyeth et al., The Impact of Citizen Environmental Science in the United States, 49 ELR 10237 (2019). 5. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Jesus Ferreira, Appellant, vCity of Binghamton et al., Respondents. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Jesus Ferreira, Appellant, vCity of Binghamton et al., Respondents. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
National Socialist Party of America v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
State Street Corporation, U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm
Federal Courts: Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm
For example, Congress should change the focus of TANF – from a program that focuses on placing recipients into low-wage dead-end jobs, to a program that provides a bridge out of poverty. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:34 am
For example, Congress should change the focus of TANF – from a program that focuses on placing recipients into low-wage dead-end jobs, to a program that provides a bridge out of poverty. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Porsche AG: (Class 46), WIPO: Yell Limited v Yell.travel: domain name yell.travel to be transferred to Yell Limited: (Class 46), Some see rise in non-traditional trade marks; national registries not yet: (Intellectual Property Watch) Global - Patents Lower patentability standards – strategic responses: (IP Thinktank), IP Business Congress sees Finnish inventor become a millionaire: (IAM), Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for effectively analysing an invention and then… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
One can find in the Yugoslavia court cases many instances of criminal liability for wanton and disproportionate devastation, involving, say, a Serb paramilitary unit deliberately trashing a village. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
DPPA was initially introduced in the House of Representatives on March 30, 2006 and would amend title 17, section 2 of the United States Code, by expanding the term, "design," to include "fashion design" and affording protection to fashion designs.[9] An identical bill was also introduced in the Senate on August 2, 2007.[10] DPPA would essentially extend protection to the appearance as a whole of an article of apparel, including its ornamentation, with apparel… [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
For example, the United States’s general copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author, and Mexico’s duration is 100 years after the death of the author. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
