Search for: "Brito v. Brito"
Results 21 - 40
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
Brito, R. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:43 am
Brito, R. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Miguel Alejandro Brito-Roman, A073 743 637 (BIA Mar. 11, 2016) (2016 WL 1357980) - The BIA dismissed respondent’s appeal and affirmed the IJ’s denial of respondent’s motion to amend his pleadings and order of removal. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Miguel Alejandro Brito-Roman, A073 743 637 (BIA Mar. 11, 2016) (2016 WL 1357980) - The BIA dismissed respondent’s appeal and affirmed the IJ’s denial of respondent’s motion to amend his pleadings and order of removal. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:36 pm
The case is called Wilson v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Delays in the conclusion of examinations by the Brazilian Patent and Trade Mark Office (BPTO) have been the target of much criticism and some lawsuits, writes Ana Paula Affonso Brito (Attorney at Law, Montaury Pimenta, Machado & Vieira de Mello, Rio de Janeiro). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
Panelists:Jerry Brito, Mercatus Center, GMU: Divides us because seen in moral terms: for/against property. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 4:38 pm
So reads the headline to a New York Law Journal article about yesterday’s New York appellate court decision in Matter of Brito v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:55 am
Brito, Raymond Kirk Anderson, and Monica Ashley Wedgewood have posted “Chronicle of a Debt Foretold: Zablocki v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 12:30 pm
Brito, Raymond Kirk Anderson, and Monica Ashley Wedgewood, University of Wisconsin, have posted Chronicle of a Debt Foretold: Zablocki v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Earlier in 2012, we reported on the case of Brito v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:16 am
Hhurrun Ashraf Dentistry and Brito v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 4:18 pm
Bridgeman v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:02 pm
New York, NY: The Foundation for a Civil Society.Barahona de Brito, Alexandra, Carmen González-Enríquez, and Paloma Aguilar, eds. 2001. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 9:57 am
* Kinbook v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Goldstein v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 5:27 am
He contended that the reviewing officer’s decision was unlawful because European jurisprudence required her to consider, when considering if he was temporarily unable to work, whether there was any chance of Mr Samin returning to work.Unfortunately for Mr Samin, by the time the appeal was heard the Court of Appeal had already considered the question in two other appeals, namely De Brito v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 709 and Konodyba v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea… [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 5:27 am
He contended that the reviewing officer’s decision was unlawful because European jurisprudence required her to consider, when considering if he was temporarily unable to work, whether there was any chance of Mr Samin returning to work.Unfortunately for Mr Samin, by the time the appeal was heard the Court of Appeal had already considered the question in two other appeals, namely De Brito v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 709 and Konodyba v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:06 pm
V. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:25 am
In Brito v Canac Kitchens, the employee became permanently disabled and did not recover. [read post]
