Search for: "Brooks v April" Results 21 - 40 of 388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
BY: Sean Gravel, Florida State University College of Law Class of 2015 April 12, 2013              One of the most criticized opinions of the United States Supreme Court is Dred Scott v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally:  Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 8:54 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 56953, April 12, 2017), allowed an inmate to move ahead with his claim that a chain and crucifix he possessed were improperly seized because he had prior authorization for them.In Little v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These allegations state a cause of action for legal malpractice (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:37 am by John Hochfelder
On April 14, 2005 Adina Raso, then 14 years old, had two impacted wisdom teeth extracted by an oral surgeon in Stony Brook. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:36 am by Thom Cooper
By Brooke Curtis I have not been with Cooper and Adel for long, but in the short time that I have been here I have seen the dedication that we have given to the veterans and current military personnel that we represent. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., rejects the Brooks Furniture framework as unduly rigid and inconsistent with the text of §285. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:28 am by sally
Supreme Court Inveresk plc v Papermakers Ltd [2010] UKSC 19 (05 May 2010) Farstad Supply AS v Enviroco Ltd [2010] UKSC 18 (05 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) White & Ors v The Crown [2010] EWCA Crim 978 (05 May 2010) Cooper, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 979 (05 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Brookes v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 420 (29 April 2010) Durham Tees Valley… [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
The law firm Bains Cohen (acting pro bono for the claimant, Nicola Brooke) and a PR agency are leading the campaign. [read post]