Search for: "Brooks v. State of Oregon"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Jan. 13, 2000).Oregon: Allen v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:03 am
” Burwell v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
For other Texas (and other states’) cases applying the learned intermediary rule to prescription medical devices, see our post here.Collectively, strike one.Second, Texas’ rejection of design defect claims involving prescription medical products is also reflected in that state’s product liability statute. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:33 pm
There was a time when bull trout, like most salmonids, were wildly abundant in the six western states of Oregon, Washington, California, Nevada, Idaho and Montana. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm
Oregon passed a law making the process easier. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Navy: (IP Law360),Crown Packaging - Summary judgment granted to Reexam Beverage Co finding patent infringement by Crown: (Delaware IP Law),eBay - District Court held that likelihood of confusion analysis is not limited to the goods or services for which mark was registered in Applied Information Sciences v eBay: (IP Law Observer),Global Patent Holdings - GPH files another patent infringement case regarding their JPEG on a website patent:… [read post]
College Football Predictions for FBS Week 3 2012 by SportPundit and the Yards Per Play System YPPSYS
10 Sep 2012, 12:12 pm
Result: Stony Brook v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am
This news follows a recent ruling in Latif v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
In Brooke Group v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:10 pm
The plaintiffs in Applewhite v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Ranbaxy and AstraZeneca reach agreement in Esomeprazole patent litigation: (SmartBrief), (IPBiz), (Spicy IP), (Profitability through Simplicity), (IP Law360), (Philip Brooks), (GenericsWeb), Cadbury loses Australian battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks… [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Charles Pfizer & Co., 532 P.2d 1377, 1381 (Okla. 1974).Oregon: Oksenholt v. [read post]