Search for: "Brooks v. The State of California" Results 21 - 40 of 390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Supreme Court said California could put whatever restrictions it wanted on selling meat, it left rural producer states scratching their heads. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, even in the most liberal states, such as California, voters have repeatedly rejected affirmative action in college admissions. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Mo Brooks, January 6, and the Effort to Overturn an Election, (Nov. 9, 2021) 12. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by NARF
(Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Tribal Sovereignty) Brooks v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
California Governor Gavin Newsom, for example, signed a bill protecting abortion recipients and providers in California from lawsuits from other states that outlaw abortion or that may make it illegal for a person to travel to California to receive an abortion. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 5:53 pm by Richard Hunt
The case is also interesting because it was brought entirely under California state law. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm by NARF
Charging Crow (Restitution Payments; Tribal Annuity Payments) Eagle Bear, Inc. and Brooke v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
Ancestry Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:16 am by Cameron Kerry
In June, the Supreme Court provided appellate judges with a neutron bomb against agency regulations with its decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]