Search for: "Brown v. Bernstein" Results 21 - 40 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 6:36 am by David Bernstein
Wagner was willing to remove an antidiscrimination provision from the Wagner Act to placate the AFL, which wanted to use its new power to exclude blacks, FDR was unwilling to support anti-lynching legislation, and so on (more examples can be found in my Only One Place of Redress book)—and 1964, when a significant majority of the white public supported Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:03 am by Rebecca Jeschke
These include ABBA, Adele, Jhené Aiko, Alabama Shakes, Alex Da Kid, Axwell & Ingrosso, J Balvin, Bastille, Beach Boys, Beastie Boys, Bee Gees, Irving Berlin, Leonard Bernstein, Jeff Bhasker, Justin Bieber, Benny Blanco, Chris Brown, Kane Brown, Mariah Carey, Michael Chabon, Desmond Child, The Clash, Coldplay, J. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The legal malpractice case is first dismissed:  “Plaintiff’s claim for legal malpractice in connection with an underlying settlement fails to state a cause of action in the absence of allegations that the “settlement . . . was effectively compelled by the mistakes of [defendant] counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]) or the result of fraud or coercion (see Beattie v Brown & Wood, 243 AD2d 395… [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:51 am by Kali Borkoski
Wednesday’s argument in Snyder v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:03 pm by David Bernstein
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court did, in fact, adhere to a “libertarian philosophy” in one race case, Buchanan v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 . was effectively compelled by the mistakes of [defendant] counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]) or the result of fraud or coercion (see Beattie v Brown & Wood, 243 AD2d 395 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bernstein, Debevoise & Plimpton Defended the presumption of irreparable harm after a finding of false advertising. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:34 am by Adam Schlossman
In 1957, three years after the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:35 pm
Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, 552 (1896) (Harlan, J., dissenting), overruled by Brown v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:07 am by Ilya Somin
It is ironic that MacLean falsely accuses of James Buchanan and other libertarians of opposing Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:18 am by David Bernstein
” Finally, MacLean seems to suggest the economist James Buchanan, the villain of the book, developed his “public choice” ideas in response to Brown v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:40 am by Walter Olson
Todd Brown, Buffalo, SSRN] Could Gene McCarthy’s candidacy have survived Arizona elections law? [read post]