Search for: "Brown v. Department of Justice" Results 21 - 40 of 1,288
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Narintohn Luangrath
Hall notes that under the test Justice Gorsuch articulates in his Gundy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
One need look no further than last week’s sentencing of Samuel Bankman-Fried to see the impact of noncompliance.[12] In advance of the sentencing, the Department of Justice filed hundreds of victim statements with the court.[13] The victim statements reflect the incredibly broad cross-section of people who were harmed by the fraud that Bankman-Fried was convicted of: single parents, retirees, young people, grandparents. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am by Guest Author
Department of Labor); the COVID-19 eviction moratorium (Alabama Ass’n of Realtors); the Clean Power Plan (West Virginia v. [read post]
Prelogar explained the FDA received legal analysis from the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel on its interpretation of the Comstock Act to guide it in the regulatory process. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
For some of us, what was most chilling from oral arguments were the sentiments voiced by justices on the left of the court, particularly Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
He could not do what other Chief Justices had done in cases like Brown v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
” Fourth Circuit overturns massive jury verdict in copyright case against internet service provider — Attorney Evan Brown looks at this week’s Fourth Circuit decision in Sony Music Entertainment v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
In the past, we have cited Justice Story's analysis in Section 791 to show there are good early American sources that put forward the same views we have put forward. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
Then, the justices read a summarized version of two opinions they were announcing for the day, which included Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am by Jonathan H. Adler
All they seek after trail is a declaratory judgment of their rights and the government's wrongs, just as the students in Brown v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
  It is significant that the Department of Justice has prosecuted hundreds of persons for their involvement in the January 6 incursion at the Capitol, but has not charged anyone, including Trump, with insurrection under this or any other statute. [read post]