Search for: "Brown v. Director of Revenue"
Results 21 - 40
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
The Legal Representative of Succession Paul de Maroussem v The Director-General, Mauritius Revenue Authority, heard 8 June 2011. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
Stanford International Bank Ltd (acting by its joint liquidators) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, heard 23 – 25 January 2012. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
Thomas (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, March 9, 2018 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Hedge funds, In re Revlon, In re Trulia, Management, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Unocal v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
In denying relief, Acting Surrogate Brown relied upon section 3740 of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
In denying relief, Acting Surrogate Brown relied upon section 3740 of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
For public corporations in particular, the aftershocks of a financial reporting problem can pale in comparison to the debilitating revenue loss, not to mention the regulatory onslaught and litigation fallout, experienced in the aftermath of a cyber-attack. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs, heard 25 February 2016. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
The Legal Representative of Succession Paul de Maroussem v The Director-General, Mauritius Revenue Authority, heard 8 June 2011. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm
BRAZIL The second round of voting in the Brazilian presidential elections took place on 30 October 2022. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:50 am
Brown signed SB 1121, the first of possibly several amendments designed to fix and rehabilitate the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:45 am
As a result, because consumers have not themselves been harmed, the BCS argues that it does not violate federal antitrust law.This defense draws on a line of antitrust precedent dating back to the Supreme Court's 1962 decision in Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
Tuesday 21 February will see the beginning of a six day hearing for Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of the Inland Revenue& anr in front of a seven judge panel ( L Hope, L Walker, L Brown, L Clarke, L Dyson, L Sumption, L Reed). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:48 am
The Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 3:14 am
Centrally, it comprises the European Chief Prosecutor, 22 European Prosecutors (each appointed by participating EU countries), and the Administrative Director. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
Matosantos as Director et al. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm
” Justice Kennedy sounded a similarly skeptical note that the Court owed the IRS deference: “it seems to me a drastic step for us to say that the Department of Internal Revenue and its director can make this call one way or the other when there are, what, billions of dollars of subsidies involved here? [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:17 am
Significantly, the decision in Browning-Ferris Indus. of Calif., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
Matosantos as Director et al. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 5:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
