Search for: "Brown v. Ives" Results 21 - 40 of 463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Intact Insurance, 2018 ONCA 725, 142 O.R. (3d) 561, where Brown J.A. undertook an analysis of the existing authorities on the proper interpretation of s. 5(1)(a)(iv). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:15 pm by Lawrence Solum
Furthermore, political movements sometimes build on legal victories, as well as defeats, as happened in the case of the Civil Rights movement in the wake of Brown v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 9:59 pm
IV, PARA. 53.c.(94) (2005 ED.).United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by INFORRM
The majority of the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown and Mance) opted for a purposive interpretation of Part IV, Schedule 1 of the Act. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:04 pm by Robert Tanha
In Brown v. 1714717 Ontario Inc., decided April 26, 2011, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found that an employer had wrongfully terminated the applicant employee when it dismissed her without cause, and in reprisal for requesting and taking time off for a vacation.Because the employee in the case had completed less than twelve months of employment at the time she asked for time-off, she was not entitled to take a vacation or receive vacation pay under Part XI of the Ontario… [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 5:45 pm
State of Indiana , a 26-page opinion, Judge Brown concludes:For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Micheau's convictions for Count I, dealing in methamphetamine as a class B felony; Count III, dealing in a sawed off shotgun as a class D felony; Count IV, possession of marijuana as a class A misdemeanor; and Count VI, attempted dealing in methamphetamine as a class A felony. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 1:46 am
Massey of Brown, Drew & Massey, LLP, Casper, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Department of Revenue: Bruce A. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:01 pm
I conclude that my proposals articulated in Parts IV and V will result in efficient and appropriate levels of conservation while promoting decentralization of private property ownership. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am by Anita Davies
In R v Brown (Anthony) [1994] 1 AC 212 sadomasochists were held to have been rightly convicted of causing injury to others who willingly consented to the injuries that they received. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:44 pm
Schacht , a 17-page opinion, Judge Brown writes:David E. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
In Courtroom 1, Gale and another v Serious Organised Crime Agency is to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Judge, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:45 pm
 For example, here's a brief description of one of the plaintiffs:  "Donorovich-Odonnell, who resides in Santa Clarita, suffers from stage IV adenocarcinoma of the left lung, which has metastasized to her brain, liver, spine, and rib. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:43 pm by Shannon O'Hare
Activities Prohibited During the moratorium, a court may not, for a “non-essential eviction,” (i) accept the filing of a summons or complaint, (ii) enter a judgment for possession for a plaintiff, (iii) issue an execution for possession, (iv) deny a request for a stay of execution or a continuance, or (v) schedule a court event, including a summary process trial. [read post]