Search for: "Brown v. Michigan Department of Corrections"
Results 21 - 40
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
i The Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the presidency are spare, and in every formal sense, at least, Donald J. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
State v Brown, 2003-Ohio-3931 (syllabus) (Section 14, Article I of the Ohio Constitution provides greater protection than the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution against warrantless arrests for minor misdemeanors.) [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 8:14 am
Michigan Department of Corrections, 2016 U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Department of Corrections, 2016 U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Michigan, 14-824, for the first time. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
” He notes the roughly ten years between Brown v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Also, with the advent of parole, Congress moved toward a "three-way sharing" of sentencing responsibility by granting corrections personnel in the Executive Branch the discretion to release a prisoner before the expiration of the sentence imposed by the judge. * * *. . . . [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:04 am
Since the Supreme Court's 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am
Department of Public Health Mary Lynn L. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 8:00 am
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2011 U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
Title: Rast v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
The Justice Department identified the attorney as Lauren Stevens, of Durham, N.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Rather, it is the combination of a 1913 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Michigan Central R.R. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The EPA and health department had sued the companies, claiming the slag-dumping process at the mill violates the federal Clean Air Act. [read post]
