Search for: "Brown v. Williams (2000)" Results 21 - 40 of 217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2022, 11:22 am by Guest Author
While he was chairing the Section, he co-authored the ABA’s amicus curiae brief in INS v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 7:48 pm by William Jaksa
McNeill, 2000 CanLII 4897 The post The Rule in Browne and Dunn – the confrontation rule appeared first on William Jaksa. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 7:37 am by Ronald Levin
” A notable example of this attitude was Breyer’s 2000 dissent in FDA v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 8:38 am by Cecillia Wang
Following four years of failed policies at the Department of Justice under the leadership of Jeff Sessions and William Barr, Garland has the opportunity — and the mandate — to restore civil rights and civil liberties left in tatters by the Trump administration. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Vendors of goods and services utilize standard form contracts to reduce or minimize transaction costs and to ensure consistency in the terms applied to similar transactions. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
” It is hard to imagine John Marshall or William Howard Taft exciting such passionate responses. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 783, 2000 SCC 31, this Court held that requiring the licensing and registration of firearms was a valid exercise of the federal criminal law power… A similar argument was raised before the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in Hudson v. [read post]