Search for: "Buchanan, S. v. Buchanan, H."
Results 21 - 40
of 139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court has now heard oral arguments in two gerrymandering cases this term, and the world wonders whether Justice Anthony Kennedy will at last carry through on his suggestion in 2004’s Vieth v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
Herbin-Triant (University of Massachusetts Lowell) marks the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Buchanan v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
The first big case, NFIB v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In other words, Roberts and Ginsburg were in unexpected positions.This reminded me of another Supreme Court case pertaining to state tax issues, 2015’s Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
One of the Court’s absolute worst recent decisions, Trump v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
The Mueller report was supposedly an attempted coup, Trump’s impeachment was similarly an attempted coup, and pretty much everything else is a plot to take away Trump’s “landslide” victory in 2016. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm
Similarly, putative Senate moderates like Lindsey Graham and John McCain joined in to claim that Clinton’s win did not make her a legitimate president.These Republicans pointed to Clinton’s relatively slim margins of victory in key states like New Hampshire, Michigan, Florida, Pennsylvania, and Nevada. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
It has happened before.Biden’s ongoing fixation on the courts betrays a basic misunderstanding of his role. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Although “The Anthony Kennedy Show” has now been superseded by what will surely be an entertaining but entirely predictable renewal of “The Confirmation Show: Now Even More Evasive,” it is still valuable to consider Justice Kennedy’s hand in the Supreme Court’s hard-right turn that paid off so handsomely for conservative activists this year.In some ways, the most perversely interesting opinion that the Court’s Conservative Five… [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
A podcast on Buchanan v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Rubio has said that he would appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
At least as early as Trump’s first troubling decision to encourage violence against protesters at his rallies, and certainly since his call to “Second Amendment people” to rise up and fight against a future President Hillary Clinton’s imaginary effort to confiscate firearms, Trump’s presence on the scene has intensified the threat of deadly violence in American politics.Trump, through the very end of last year’s campaign, played… [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Now, the Republicans’ leader responds to a description of Russia’s president as a murderer by saying that “we’ve got a lot of killers,” too, and asking: “What, do you think our country’s so innocent? [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Republicans’ response was not merely, “We think that’s bad policy, and here’s why,” but “That’s unconstitutional…we hope. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Republicans’ response was not merely, “We think that’s bad policy, and here’s why,” but “That’s unconstitutional…we hope. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
One of Trump’s top advisors resigned, but most did not. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
He was wrong that that case should stand in the way of Congress, but he was wrong in a way that is both understandable and that might point to a way for motivated Supreme Court conservatives to block Congress’s possible future policy choice.In 1920, the Supreme Court held 5-4 in favor of the taxpayer in the now-infamous Eisner v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:41 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Many people acknowledge that Reagan would not be nearly conservative enough for today’s Republican Party, yet the press cannot resist labeling as “moderates” conservative extremists like Susan Collins (who actually believes, among other things, that tax cuts pay for themselves—and who claimed to believe that Brett Kavanaugh would not overturn Roe v. [read post]
